supposedly, nonpartisan policy experts and fact checkers have been eager beavers when it comes to criticizing the math in governor romney's tax proposal but maybe they should check the president's math as well. if we do not eliminate the a.m.t., it will hilt millions and mill -- hit millions and millions of american taxpayers, unjustly some the president claims a permanent fix is a priority of his. in his fiscal year 2013 budget, he proposed to offset it with the buffett tax. people treat the president's fiscal year 2013 budget as though it never happened. in some sense, i understand that. it received not a single vote in the united states senate. even with his own party controlling the chamber. but that said, it is the president's budget. he wrote it. he presented it. he owns it. and how does it add up? consider the math on this permanent a.m.t. fix. again, he proposes to replace the a.m.t., he is sentencably helping middle-class taxpayers, with the buffett tax, ostensibly hurting the evil rich. that sounds great until you look at the numbers. how much revenue loss would there be from a perm